Impact Of Gst On Banking Industry Issues In Gst On Banking Sector

This article lay down various issues that a Banking sector may face due to advent of GST and the suggestions so as to amend the rules, wherever required to be address the negative impact of GST on the Banking sector. Various aspects discussed herewith would apply to all types of banks viz., Nationalised Banks, Private Banks, Public Banks, Co-operative Banks etc. However, the article does not lay discussion on Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFC’s), Micro Finance companies, Credit Cooperative societies etc.

Impact of GST on Banking Industry, Issues in GST on Banking Sector

1) State-wise Registration requirement:

Currently, all banks have a centralized registrations under the Service Tax laws for all its branches.Banks having branches in multiple states& Union Territories (UT) will be required to obtain registrations in each such state & Union Territory in the GST regime. Such a requirement will have huge compliance burden on the banks. Further, high coordination and control between the banks within and outside state for tax matters needs to be placed. Moreover, under GST, accounting, administration, financial records etc, would be required to be maintained for each state-wise separately. This will be highly cumbersome and challenging.Since, it will be difficult for the Banks to cope up with such radical change of taking state-wise registrations, filing multiple returns state-wise, multiple audits and assessments; especially in a scenario where banks have presence in almost every state and union territory of the country and with each state, each city, each locality has a branch of the bank. Further, even state-wise regional banks do not have capabilities to coordinate and receive information from all the branches within the state and comply with the tax requirements. With so many branches, the entire coordination and assimilation of information at one place for compliance by each state regional bank shall also be a challenge. Therefore, government must provide for some special scheme to the banking sector so that the high administration and compliance burden as placed under the GST is reduced as the business dynamics of banking sector largely differs from that of other industries

Accounts and Administration:

As GST stands today, transactions between two branches of same bank is set to trigger a tax, which could prove to be cumbersome.

GST would require restructuring of accounting, administration and control mechanism in the IT systems and processes of banks to be able to maintain financial records of each State separately.GST being levied on branch transactions could be cumbersome because of the enormous number of financial transactions being carried out.

Place of Supply of Goods and Services:

Under GST Law the place of supply of services for banking and other financial services (BOFS) shall be the location of the recipient of services on the records of the supplier of services. Provided that if the location of recipient of services is not on the records of the supplier, the place of supply shall be the location of the supplier of services. However, what constitutes the ‘records of the supplier’ is not defined in the law leading to multiple interpretations as to whether it is to be understood as accounting records or customer records, vendor records and so on. Further, in some cases banks would have multiple addresses of the same customer in its records, this is possible as in case of a banking sector a customer would add multiple accounts within the same customer id and in which case only one address of the customer under whose address that customer id is registered would be reflected as the address on records. However it is possible that the transaction is undertaken with the account holder within the same customer id but having a branch in different state. In such a situation, if strictly banks pay GST to the state based on the “address on record” then it may end up paying GST in a wrong state. Therefore, banks have to record the address of each account holders within the same customer id and GST needs to be charged on that account holder and accordingly tax also must be paid to that respective state government of the account holder and not the single address captured for the entire customer id. E.g. it is quite possible that bank issues ‘bank guarantee’ to be submitted to a local authority by a company. Now, if as per the bank’s records, address of the customer [as its HO] is mentioned/ maintained where such address is in the other state, wrong GST may get levied. It is in this background, it is suggested to bring suitable clarity in the place of supply provisions in this regard and the term “Address on Records” be clearly defined to avoid any disputes as to determination of place of supply.

Taxability of Interest:

Presently, interest income and discount provided by the banks are covered under negative list, hence not taxable to service tax. Under GST, the term ‘service’ is defined in a wide manner to cover ‘anything other than goods’ which may cover interest as well.Governments across the world do not levy GST on interest. The GST Law in India too should clarify if interest is outside the ambit of GST. If ‘interest’ is not expected to attract GST, it will have implications on input tax credits claimed by banks. Further, such a move would have larger economic issues. Therefore, we suggest to follow the current scenario where in the service tax law, interest is kept in the negative list, similarly interest can be kept in schedule 3 of the GST law so that it neither amounts to supply of good nor service and therefore no GST would be applicable on the same.

Reversal of Input Tax Credit on Capital Goods:

Presently, as per Rule 6(3B) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, an assessee in banking sector has to reverse 50% of the CENVAT Credit taken on monthly basis on inputs and input services. However, banks can take full credit on Capital goods unless the said capital goods are exclusively used for any exempted service. However, section 17(4) of the GST law states that banks engaged in supplying services by way of accepting deposits, extending loans or advances have to reverse 50% of the eligible input tax credit on inputs, capital goods and input services. It is pertinent to note that requirement of reversal of standard 50% credit even on the capital goods portion will have negative impact. Various office furniture, equipments, cash-counting machines, computers, printers, air-conditioners etc. are of high procurement cost for any branch of the bank and if 50% of the credit on the same is to be reversed then it shall have an adverse impact. Further, since all the capital assets are used for common services, therefore. ITC of only 50% in respect of the capital goods gets allowed. Therefore, we suggest that the provision of reversal of 50% credit for capital goods must be removed.Alternatively, the same may be brought in line with the current service tax law and the credit for capital goods must be available in maximum of 2 years as per the present service tax law.

Reversal of Input Tax credit over and above standard 50%:

As per the provisions of the GST Act, option has been given to bankers to reverse 50% of the CENVAT credit instead of reversing based on the input service partly attributable to the taxable supply and exempted supplies. Similar provision is also in place under Service Tax law. However, it is noted that departmental notices are being issued demanding to reverse CENVAT credit of input, input services that are exclusively used for exempted services even though the option for reversal of credit at 50% is opted for. It is therefore suggested to have a specific clause incorporated stating that once the option to reverse tax at 50% is opted, then there should not be any conditions imposed over actual correlation of output services/ goods with input services/ goods for the purpose of rejection of credits. In such scenario, the entire tax paid for the procurement of goods and services, irrespective of whether the same are directly or indirectly used for the taxable or exempted supplies can be easily reversed at a specified reversal percentage without any distortions as to interpretation of the law.

Repossession of Assets of Defaulters:

As per existing law and practice, when a bank repossesses assets from a defaulter of loan and sells the same, VAT is paid by the bank as a ‘dealer’ in terms of State VAT laws. Treatment of this under GST will be quite interesting, which need to be looked upon.

Benefits to Banking industry:

Bank will be able to set off their GST liabilities against credit received on purchase of goods.Under the existing CENVAT mechanism, banks are eligible to take partial credit of excise duty and service tax paid on procurement of qualifying goods and services which are used for provision of output service but under GST law bank will take input tax credit which would be used by bank for payment of output liability.Banks do not get input tax credit of State VAT paid on any goods procured by them. As all these indirect taxes will be subsumed in GST, banks will be able to take credit of GST paid on procurement of goods as well.GST Will help to reduce tax evasion. Under GST doing business will be easy. The increase in business will lead to additional demand of funds. Addition demand of funds will lead to increase in a number of transactions in the bank as the business and current scenarios ask to go for digital transaction.

Impact of GST on Banking Industry, Issues in GST on Banking Sector#

1) State-wise Registration requirement:#

Accounts and Administration:#

Place of Supply of Goods and Services:#

Taxability of Interest:#

Reversal of Input Tax Credit on Capital Goods:#

Reversal of Input Tax credit over and above standard 50%:#

Repossession of Assets of Defaulters:#

Benefits to Banking industry:#